NFL Draft: LB Rankings
1
Sonny Styles
School: Ohio State
Ht/Wt: 6’5”, 244 lbs
Strengths:
– High impact player, despite only switching to LB from S in 2024.
– Freaky athleticism.
– Rare combination of size/athleticism.
– Can cover in man, and has the length to break up passes.
– Downhill burst makes him tough to run the ball against.
– Sideline to sideline ability against the run.
– Smooth movement skills to cover a lot of space in zone coverage.
– Has the acceleration to limit damage on underneath catches.
– Has the speed to chase down the ball carrier.
– Good blitzer. Could even see some snaps off the edge.
– Looks to wrap up as a tackler.
– Aggressive mindset has led to some big plays.
Weaknesses:
– Frame is a bit on the lean side. Could stand to get stronger.
– Occasional times where he has difficulty getting off blocks.
– Second level blockers sometimes take him out of the play.
– Pad level can sometimes be a bit too high when going in for a tackle.
– Bites on play action fakes.
– Motor doesn’t always seem to be super hot.
Summary:
Styles has all the makings of an impact starter at the next level. He is a sideline to sideline player who routinely makes plays against the run. His athleticism and length are both assets in coverage, and he can match up in man or zone. As well, his tools allow him to be effective as a blitzer. Styles will benefit from filling out a bit more, as it will allow him to shed blocks more effectively, and also make it tougher for ball carriers to power through his tackles for extra yards. Besides that, there are some minor technical improvements he can make as a tackler, and I would like to see better awareness to not bite on as many play action fakes. Overall, he has the makings of an elite player at his position, and he should be able to contribute right away, and improve as some of the issues get tweaked.
| Grade: 90.1 | Round Grade: 1st |
2
Jacob Rodriguez
School: Texas Tech
Ht/Wt: 6’1”, 231 lbs
Strengths:
– Fluid, smooth athlete.
– Gets hips flipped quickly and can turn and run with RB’s or TE’s in man coverage.
– Fluidity is also an asset in zone coverage. Covers a lot of ground and his passoffs are clean.
– Tackles with good wrap-up technique.
– Solid against the inside run and he also does well to track the ball carrier laterally on outside runs.
– Has a knack for punching the ball out. Forced several fumbles.
– Also has good hands and can pick off passes.
– A knack for playmaking makes him a constant presence around the ball.
– Looks good on blitzes. Able to identify the right lane and he shoots the game with the right balance of urgency and patience.
Weaknesses:
– A little bit on the small side.
– Good technique as a tackler but his size and lack of length can still lead to some missed tackles
– Generally reliable in coverage, but occasionally has a blip that leads to a big play.
– Has to cut out the instances where he bites on fakes.
– Aggressive playing style sometimes leads him to overrun his target.
– Smaller frame could make it harder to get off blocks at the next level.
Summary:
Rodriguez is a fun player to watch. He moves so well, which makes him a natural fit in both man and zone coverage. Some bad blips do show up sometimes, and these mental lapses will have to be cleaned up. But for how much talent he brings, the troubles can be forgiven for the time being. Rodriguez has the athleticism to travel parallel to the line of scrimmage and track the ball carrier on outside runs. He plays tough and uses good technique as a tackler, which makes him generally reliable. However, his smaller frame may cause a few issues at the next level. Overall, there are a few negatives, but his profile offers so much more on the good side. In coverage, the talent is evident, and the handful of blips should be able to be corrected out. Additionally, his frame might present some minor concerns as a run defender, but his instincts, athleticism, toughness, and technique all work in his favour. Enough, in my opinion, to more than make up for it. At the next level, Rodriguez projects as a 3 down starting LB with a high ceiling and a pretty good floor.
| Grade: 85.9 | Round Grade: 1st |
3
Anthony Hill
School: Texas
Ht/Wt: 6’2”, 238 lbs
Strengths:
– Speed and downhill burst stand out right away. Triggers quickly and will stuff ball carriers at the line.
– Good size and strength to make stops at the line without allowing fall-forward yards.
– Good size/speed combination.
– Amazing gap shooter, which also helps on blitzes.
– Always looking to make a play. High motor and will go sideline to sideline.
– Plays the inside and outside runs well.
– Wrap-up tackler.
– Good enough movement skills to be successful in zone coverage, even deeper down the field.
– Also has enough to play man to man in most matchups.
– Length to break up passes.
Weaknesses:
– Angles to the ball can be a bit inconsistent.
– Sometimes goes into his tackle attempts too aggressively and will let the ball carrier slip out.
– Aggressiveness sometimes causes him to overrun the play and end up out of position.
– Overall athleticism is good, but maybe some slight stiffness when moving laterally. Can still play in coverage, but some matchups might give him a bit more trouble than others.
– Instances where he shot through the wrong gap.
Summary:
Hill projects as a 3 down starting LB who can contribute in all phases. His size and strength, along with his downhill burst make him a big asset against the inside run, while he also has the speed to keep outside runs contained. I wouldn’t say his lateral fluidity is perfect, but it is good enough that he still does very well in zone, and that I’d generally trust him in man coverage. His eyes sometimes cause him issues, but that can be worked on. I like that he is a wrap-up tackler, but he sometimes flies in too recklessly, which still leads to missed tackles. Discipline is a big one, as far as improvements go. NFL coaching should help him keep things more under control. But overall, there is a lot to like, especially when it comes to the physical traits and ability to contribute in all phases of the game.
| Grade: 84.7 | Round Grade: 2nd |
4
Jake Golday
School: Cincinnati
Ht/Wt: 6’5”, 239 lbs
Strengths:
– Big frame with a large tackle radius.
– Impressive speed for his size. Also moves decently well laterally.
– Big frame makes him an asset vs the inside run.
– Plays tough and can handle work in the trenches.
– Good enough athleticism to go sideline to sideline.
– Also a good enough athlete for coverage, both man and zone.
Weaknesses:
– Instincts are still coming along.
– Instances of false steps when in zone, which sometimes left him a little behind.
– Is a good athlete for his size, but lateral movements are a tad segmented. I wouldn’t say he is matchup proof in man coverage.
– Twitchy RB’s and even some TE’s could best him in coverage.
– Can make quicker reads when defending the run.
Summary:
Golday has traits that catch the eye. His size and strength are standout for the position, while his athleticism is quite good too. Laterally, he is a bit segmented, so he isn’t matchup proof as far as man coverage goes, but he can certainly be used regularly in this capacity. His frame, meanwhile, makes him an asset against the run. The biggest improvements he’ll need to make are on the mental side. False steps and slow processing show up, which sometimes leaves him a step behind. If this issue persists, he’ll be more of a rotational guy and special teamer early on, but he has 3 down potential if he puts it all together.
| Grade: 82.4 | Round Grade: 2nd |
5
CJ Allen
School: Georgia
Ht/Wt: 6’1”, 230 lbs
Strengths:
– A good athlete with fluid movements.
– Does well in zone coverage, where his burst allows him to make quick breaks on the ball. He has some nice breakups on tape.
– Also good in man coverage, where he is able to blanket RB’s and TE’s.
– Active hands and frequent strikes allow him to disengage from blocks before making a tackle.
– Sideline to sideline speed. Can track down outside runs.
– Good wrap-up tackler.
Weaknesses:
– A solid technical tackler, but doesn’t have the kind of force or power that you would ideally have.
– Could get a bit stronger and play with more power.
– Sometimes bit on playaction.
– Has some mental lapses in coverage.
– Length isn’t great.
Summary:
Allen is an athletic LB that gives you ability in coverage and good play as a run defender. He is sturdy enough to play in the trenches and stop the run, even if he isn’t the most powerful player. His ability to get off blocks is still solid. But ideally, he does get stronger as he enters the next level. As he makes that transition, Allen will also have to iron out mental lapses that led to chunk yardage being eaten up the other way. As you see with most rookies, there is always a thing or two to work on. Still Allen does enough well that he should be seeing early playing time.
| Grade: 81.4 | Round Grade: 2nd |
6
Kyle Louis
School: Pitt
Ht/Wt: 6’0”, 220 lbs
Strengths:
– Elite athlete for the position.
– Thrives in coverage.
– Speed and fluidity allows him to stay tight in man coverage, regardless of the matchup.
– Lateral agility to cover ground in zone, and has the burst to close in on underneath passes.
– Instinctual player in coverage.
– Has a knack for the ball and creating turnovers.
– Speed to play sideline to sideline.
Weaknesses:
– Very undersized for the LB position.
– Gets pushed around in the trenches.
– Struggles to get off blocks.
– Has the odd instance of biting on a fake.
– Lacks length, which could allow TE’s to high point the ball and come down with it.
Summary:
Louis is a high end athlete that is at his best being used as a cover LB. He can match up in man against TE’s and RB, and also does very well in zone. He’s got a knack for the ball, and a history of generating turnovers. His athleticism gives him sideline to sideline ability, and has helped him make splash plays against the run. However, he is very undersized for the position, and has his share of struggles in the trenches. Between the tackles, you’ll likely have to live with the inconsistencies. Maybe he can bulk up a bit and raise the floor, but if not, decisions will have to be made as to whether he is a 3 down guy. Can they scheme around his limitations, or is he better off playing on passing downs? Despite the limitations, his play in coverage is exciting, and will have teams that like his skill set.
| Grade: 75.7 | Round Grade: 3rd |
7
Jimmy Rolder
School: Michigan
Ht/Wt: 6’3”, 238 lbs
Strengths:
– Instinctive player.
– Triggers quickly as a run defender, and will shoot into the gap to stuff the ball carrier.
– Reads the play quickly and puts himself in the right spots. This goes for his run defence and coverage.
– Good tackling technique – stays centre and wraps up the ball carrier.
– Sure tackler.
– Athleticism is solid enough to stick in a 3 down role.
– Capable in shallower coverage, and his instincts help in zone.
– Can cover man to man in shorter areas.
Weaknesses:
– Lacks length.
– Sometimes take poor angles when defending the run.
– Athleticism is solid, but he is a little stiff as a lateral mover, which lowers his floor in coverage. He is capable in coverage, but they should be careful about the matchups.
– He is decently strong, but his frame is a bit on the small side, which can hurt him in the trenches.
Summary:
Rolder is an instinctive player with solid, but unspectacular physical traits. He is quick to diagnose as a run defender, and has also shown to be capable in zone. However, while his athleticism is fine in a general sense, some stiffness when moving laterally does subtly hold him back from reaching another level. While he is capable in coverage, twitchier players can get the better of him. His strength is good and he is a reliable tackler, but like with his athleticism, average size prevents him from really imposing his will. Rolder can be a solid starter at the next level. He can do a bit of everything, which coaches will appreciate, even if he doesn’t reach that top tier. Additionally, he profiles as a good special teamer, which doesn’t hurt.
| Grade: 74.9 | Round Grade: 4th |
8
Kaleb Elarms-Orr
School: TCU
Ht/Wt: 6’2”, 234 lbs
Strengths:
– Elite straight line speed.
– Triggers downhill quickly and will stonewall the ball carrier.
– Great burst to limit yardage after underneath catches.
– Enough speed to play sideline to sideline and in shallow coverage.
– Long arms and good tackle radius.
– Has some good moments as a blitzer.
Weaknesses:
– Instincts are still developing.
– Bites on play action fakes.
– Instincts are still improving.
– Can be slow to react vs the run and pass alike.
– Good athlete overall, but he does show some stiffness when moving laterally. This somewhat limits sideline to sideline ability, as well as coverage.
– Would benefit from getting stronger.
Summary:
Elarms-Orr is a speedy downhill LB who stands out when the play is in front of him. Whether in coverage or defending the run between the hashmarks, his acceleration and downhill burst show up bigtime. He has the speed to pop into gaps and make a stop. He is a bit limited laterally, which limits him a little in coverage, and sometimes closer to the line. Still, his straight line speed is something to work with. He should be a good gunner and depth guy at the next level. If his instincts and mental game improve, he can actually be a good starter.
| Grade: 74.3 | Round Grade: 4th |
9
Deontae Lawson
School: Alabama
Ht/Wt: 6’3’, 226 lbs
Strengths:
– Good athlete with speed and twitch.
– Sideline to sideline speed.
– Good footwork in zone coverage and has made some pass breakups.
– Enough talent for man, though his team didn’t use him much there.
– Solid blitzer.
– Downhill speed to fill gaps as a run defender.
Weaknesses:
– Right now he doesn’t play instinctively enough.
– Can be late diagnosing and, even with good athleticism, isn’t able to recover.
– False steps show up.
– Frame is a bit light and he has some difficulties taking on contact closer to the line.
– Needs to get stronger to improve in the trenches and overall run defence.
– Force in his hand strikes is average.
– Injury history.
– Generally a good tackler, but some whiffs do show up.
Summary:
Lawson is an athletic LB with the ability to shoot gaps, flow sideline to sideline, and play in zone. He has man coverage ability, based on his athleticism, but wasn’t used much there. But the skill set translates. He will need to get stronger in order to better handle work in the trenches. As well, mental mistakes often leave him a step behind. Lawson will need some development, but he has special teams appeal early on, and comes with eventual starter potential.
| Grade: 73.9 | Round Grade: 4th |
10
Josaiah Trotter
School: Missouri
Ht/Wt: 6’2”, 237 lbs
Strengths:
– Quick downhill trigger.
– Well built frame helps him defend against the run.
– Very strong wrap-up tackler. Clean technique and doesn’t miss many.
– Toughness to defend inside runs.
– Good enough speed to also be effective on outside runs.
– Instinctual when playing the run.
– Heavy hand strike and is able to get off blocks.
– Great blitzer.
– Has rush moves reminiscent of a defensive lineman. You don’t often see this kind of technical pass rush refinement from a LB.
Weaknesses:
– Straight line speed is decent enough, but lateral agility is an issue.
– Clunkiness causes issues in different parts of his game.
– Would not trust him very often to line up in man coverage, as he loses separation when it comes time to flip his hips.
– Also is sluggish when looking to cover ground in zone. Doesn’t help that his instincts in this area aren’t great. They don’t come close to matching his instincts against the run.
Summary:
Trotter comes with his issues, which largely stem from his lack of lateral mobility and heavy feet. However, the things he does well, he does very well. He has a well built frame and plays tough. Tackling technique is good, and he doesn’t miss many. Trotter stonewalls inside runs, and has enough speed to also be effective defending runs to the outside. Additionally, he has the downhill burst to penetrate gaps as a blitzer, but his arsenal of pass rush moves is even more impressive. I don’t see him having an impact in coverage at the next level. The mobility issues can cause a lot of problems in man. They additionally hurt him in zone. His poor instincts in this area cause further problems. Ultimately, I think he is a 2 down player. This does hurt his value for me. But with that being said, if he is put in the right role and is allowed to play to his strengths, Trotter can be a very solid player. Teams that need help against the run could be interested, and his ability as a blitzer is a nice bonus. He should also be a good special teamer at the next level.
| Grade: 73.3 | Round Grade: 4th |
11
Shad Banks
School: Texas-San Antonio
Ht/Wt: 5’11”, 230 lbs
Strengths:
– Fun to watch.
– Outstanding athleticism and has a high motor to go with it.
– Always seems to be near the football.
– Sideline to sideline speed and will track the ball carrier all the way to the sideline.
– Despite size, he is not afraid to mix it up in the trenches.
– He is able to slip through gaps to get in there, and often is the one to bring down the ball carrier.
– Has the athleticism and talent to play in man or zone coverage.
– Can be a core special teamer.
– Turned in a great performance at the East-West Shrine Bowl.
Weaknesses:
– Very undersized for the position. Teams will write him off based on that alone.
– Largely faced lesser competition.
– Question of whether he can handle the trenches at the NFL level.
– Eagerness and overaggressiveness sometimes gets in the way of play diagnosis.
– Inconsistent getting off blocks.
– Has the odd mental lapse in coverage.
Summary:
People will write off Banks because of his size, but he is a fun player to watch, and seems poised to prove a lot of people wrong. He is always around the ball, and he knows how to use his size to his advantage, weaving through traffic to get into the backfield. His athleticism allows him to make sideline to sideline plays and plays in coverage. He also has high end special teams ability, which is good for a mid-late round guy. His instinct can improve and he can weed out the mistakes that happen as a result of overaggressiveness. The size issue can’t be fixed too much, even if he does get stronger. Banks’ ability to work around this deficiency was effective in college, and might still be at the NFL level. The risk is there, but I like the upside here, and I think he will outperform his eventual draft slot.
| Grade: 71.2 | Round Grade: 4th |
12
Justin Jefferson
School: Alabama
Ht/Wt: 6’0”, 223 lbs
Strengths:
– Highly athletic LB.
– Does well in coverage.
– Speed and quick feet allow him to match up in man coverage.
– Also has the foot quickness to play in zone.
– Ball production has been good.
– High motor when playing the run.
– He’ll attack down low and hunt the ball carrier.
– Good wrap up tackler when in position to make the play.
Weaknesses:
– Frame is very much on the small side.
– Pulling offensive lineman are not kind to him.
– Will have to get considerably stronger in order to handle NFL talent.
– Instincts are a work in progress.
– Will get caught ball watching or will make the wrong decision, leaving him out of position.
Summary:
Jefferson’s athleticism and coverage talent should allow him to see the field on gamedays. His moves very well, and his ability and potential as a cover LB is evident. Of course, his small frame poses questions of its own. Can he really handle the rigours of NFL trenches? It seems unlikely if he remains the same. If he can get stronger, he’ll have a chance to see a bigger role, despite still being undersized. The skill set and tackling ability is there. Jefferson will also have to improve his instincts and limit mistakes. In what is now a passing league, coverage LB’s have value. But proving he can get stronger and play in the trenches will be the difference between a rotational role and a starting role.
| Grade: 69.8 | Round Grade: 5th |
13
Harold Perkins
School: LSU
Ht/Wt: 6’1”, 223 lbs
Strengths:
– High motor.
– Can get off blocks while tracking an outside run and then make the play.
– Good downhill trigger to clog gaps.
– Gets after it as a blitzer.
– Able to navigate through traffic.
– Good, reliable tackler.
– Decent enough athleticism for work in coverage.
Weaknesses:
– Injury history.
– Movement skills haven’t quite been the same since ACL tear.
– At this point, athleticism is good, not great.
– Can cover, but lateral agility isn’t quite up to par with some of the players he’d face.
– Would prefer him in shallow stuff and less often in man.
– Instincts, both in coverage and as a run defender, leave a lot to be desired.
– Frame is on the smaller side.
Summary:
Perkins is a solid enough athlete, though not quite the same one as he was before an ACL injury. While he is capable in coverage, there are subtle limitations laterally that can give the offensive player an advantage. He is better off in shallower coverage. Perkins still plays the run pretty well and has shown he can get off blocks. Instincts is the other main hang up. Both in coverage and against the run. Improvements there will be needed. He profiles as a backup and special teamer, but has enough talent that he could claw his way up into a starting spot, if he is able to make the necessary improvements.
| Grade: 69.5 | Round Grade: 5th |
14
Namdi Obiazor
School: TCU
Ht/Wt: 6’3”, 229 lbs
Strengths:
– Build looks better on tape than measurements suggest.
– Sturdy enough for contact.
– Good enough downhill trigger to clog gaps.
– Effective blitzer who will dip his shoulder and find a way into the backfield.
– Strong tackler.
– Able to get off blocks.
– Instincts are pretty good.
– Can handle basic coverages.
Weaknesses:
– Downhill speed is alright, but agility leaves a little to be desired. It is fine, but just doesn’t quite reach that next level.
– As a result, he can be used in some coverages and is generally capable, but I’d be less enthusiastic about playing him in man or in deeper zones.
– Average change of direction also limits him, at times, as a run defender. Especially if he needs to get by an OT or flow towards the sideline.
Summary:
Obiazor comes with decent instincts and the ability to get off blocks when playing the run. He also has value as a blitzer, showing to be capable of finding his way into the backfield. He can be used in coverage, but average overall athleticism puts a cap on this usage. It can definitely be said that he is better close to home than he is spread out in man coverage or dropping back into deeper zone. Agility limitations also show up in his run defence, but the issue is less prominent. Despite the limitations, he is a reliable tackler and brings enough value between the tackles, along with basic coverage ability, to hang as a backup and core special teamer. Though his movement skills aren’t ideal, I do think he has enough to work with to potentially carve out a role as a low end starter.
| Grade: 68.7 | Round Grade: 5th |
15
Jaden Dugger
School: Louisianna
Ht/Wt: 6’4”, 240 lbs
Strengths:
– Good length for the position.
– Helps him in leverage battles.
– Good wrap-up tackler. Hard to miss too many with his length.
– Good straight line speed that allows him to shoot gaps and close in quickly on underneath routes.
– Decent enough range to play sideline to sideline.
– Good enough athlete to hold his own in coverage. Being a former S helps.
Weaknesses:
– Frame is lean and he lacks the strength to consistently hang in the trenches.
– Will need to fill out.
– Good athlete in a general sense, but shows some stiffness when moving laterally. Not surprising for a long-limbed player.
– Can go sideline to sideline, but stiffness does hold him back.
– Same goes for his coverage.
– Instincts aren’t there yet, as a former S turned LB.
– Doesn’t read plays well against the run or pass.
Summary:
Dugger is a ball of clay that is still working out the nuances of the LB position, having made the switch from S. His instincts are still a work in progress. As well, his frame is long and tall, but very lean. Stronger players take advantage. The good news is that he has lots of room to fill out, but actually doing so will be important. His long limbs create some challenges moving laterally. It isn;t something too major, but it is noticeable enough. Overall, Dugger has enough to work on that he is unlikely to be more than a late round project. But he also has enough traits that it is one worthy of being taken on late in the draft.
| Grade: 60.0 | Round Grade: 6th |
16
Jack Kelly
School: BYU
Ht/Wt: 6’2”, 240 lbs
Strengths:
– Good build to handle work in the trenches.
– Hand strikes pack some power.
– Is able to get off blocks to make plays against the run.
– Generally a reliable tackler.
– High motor. Has made plays thanks to his pure desire.
– Good enough straight line speed to get downhill in time to clog gaps.
Weaknesses:
– Stiff when moving laterally.
– This will limit him in coverage. He can handle shallow zone, but I wouldn’t trust him to consistently drop deeper, or to play man to man.
– Can gap penetrate as a blitzer, but lacks bend to finish some of those plays off.
– Sometimes gets overeager and will overrun the play.
Summary:
Kelly comes with a relatively safe floor of someone who can play on early downs as a run stuffer, while excelling on special teams. However, he lacks the lateral agility to consistently perform in coverage, or to make sideline to sideline plays. His build and ability to stuff the run, as well as his special teams ability, will have a spot waiting for him somewhere. But the upside is limited and I don’t see 3 down starter potential.
| Grade: 56.6 | Round Grade: 7th |
17
Bryce Boettcher
School: Oregon
Ht/Wt: 6’1”, 230 lbs
Strengths:
– Sure, reliable tackler.
– Good wrap-up technique
– Instinctual player.
– Reads the play well and can react early, putting himself in position to make a play.
– Good inside run defender because of this.
– Capable of shallow zone coverage.
– Good special teamer.
– High motor.
Weaknesses:
– A limited athlete with limited upside.
– Has quick enough feet for shallow zone, but I wouldn’t trust him consistently beyond that.
– Good tackler because of good technique, but his strength doesn’t stand out. It is okay, but nothing more.
– Not really a sideline to sideline guy.
– NFL jump will pose additional challenges.
Summary:
Boettcher brings strong tackling and good football IQ, but lacks high end physical traits. On the defensive side, he’ll have the chance to contribute as an inside run defender, with some shallow zone sprinkled in. His best asset may be special teams ability. He’s got a high motor and toughness that fits with special teams culture. Boettcher can crack a roster, but it wouldn’t be as more than a depth/special teams guy.
| Grade: 56.1 | Round Grade: 7th |
18
Red Murdock
School: Buffalo
Ht/Wt: 6’2”, 232 lbs
Strengths:
– Very hard hitter.
– Crazy amount of forced fumbles.
– Strong build with the ability to take on contact in the trenches.
– Plays the inside run well
– Good special teamer.
Weaknesses:
– A limited athlete who lacks the speed or agility to really be used much in any kind of coverage.
– Instincts in coverage were also off.
– Reaction time in general could be faster.
– Not able to go sideline to sideline consistently to defend against the run.
– Length isn’t great.
Summary:
Murdock is a hard hitting inside LB with a knack for forcing fumbles. He triggers downhill quickly and will lower the shoulder to deliver a powerful blow. Unfortunately, his athleticism doesn’t match, and there are clear limitations. I wouldn’t trust him in coverage at the next level, and he also lacks sideline to sideline speed. His production and splash plays could earn him a rotational role on running downs, but he might need to prove worth on special teams first. Overall, he is a low upside player, but the kind who often finds a way to stick on the back of a roster as either a late round pick or undrafted free agent.
| Grade: 55.1 | Round Grade: 7th |
LB Rankings:
1. Sonny Styles (90.1, Rd 1)
2. Jacob Rodriguez (85.9, Rd 1)
3. Anthony Hill (84.7, Rd 2)
4. Jake Golday (82.4, Rd 2)
5. CJ Allen (81.4, Rd 2)
6. Kyle Louis (75.7, Rd 3)
7. Jimmy Rolder (74.9, Rd 4)
8. Kaleb Elarms-Orr (74.3, Rd 4)
9. Deontae Lawson (73.9, Rd 4)
10. Josiah Trotter (73.3, Rd 4)
11. Shad Banks (71.2, Rd 4)
12. Justin Jefferson (69.8, Rd 5)
13. Harold Perkins (69.5, Rd 5)
14. Namdi Obiazor (68.7, Rd 5)
15. Jaden Dugger (60.0, Rd 6)
16. Jack Kelly (56.6, Rd 7)
17. Bryce Boettcher (56.1, Rd 7)
18. Red Murdock (55.1, Rd 7)
Notables Not Graded:
– Keyshaun Elliott
– Taurean York
– Wade Woodaz
– Kendal Daniels
– Lander Barton
– Scooby Williams
– Khalil Jacobs
– Wesley Bissainthe
– Eric Gentry
Thumbnail Image Via: Brad Muckenthaler (CC)