2022 NFL Draft: DT Rankings

Image Via: TigerNet (CC)

2022 NFL Draft: DT Rankings

1

Devonte Wyatt (Georgia) 6’3″, 304 lbs

Strengths

Wyatt is a good all around player, who largely is able to win with athleticism and technique. His get off is great and lateral agility is quite good.  He is able to navigate his way around the line of scrimmage in order to make his way into the backfield. Wyatt has lined up in various positions along the line, at times showing off his athleticism against OT’s. He easily has the quickness to slip into gaps against interior linemen. Wyatt’s variety of pass rush moves adds to his threat level. He has a good arm over and can counter when his bull rush is stifled. He has also flashed an effective spin move. Against the run, his quickness further shows off. He is able to redirect his frame towards the ball carrier and will lay out to make the tackle.

Weaknesses

Strength by no means is bad, but if I had to pick out a weakness of his game, this would be it. Wyatt can be a little inconsistent with his bullrush, and the stronger interior linemen are able to anchor down. Further, his ability to penetrate through double teams is hit or miss. It is something I’d like to see more improvement on. Double team blocks also limit his effectiveness against the run, and there were some plays where he was ploughed right out of the way.Arm length is also on the shorter side, which limits both his tackle radius and ability to disengage from blocks.

Summary

Wyatt is an outstanding pass rusher who wins with great burst, quickness, and a variety of pass rush moves. He is a disruptive presence in the backfield. He lacks that extra bit of power in his game, and can have trouble against beefier offensive linemen. But he can improve that with some work in the weight room. In terms of long term limitations, the length is the one that stands out, as it will force him to work harder to get off blocks and make tackles. However, even with a few weaknesses, the athleticism and rush moves give him a high floor, while his high ceiling can be reached if he adds on a bit more strength.

Grade: 88.6Round Grade: 1st

2

DeMarvin Leal (Texas A&M) 6’4″, 284 lbs

Strengths

Leal is an athletic player with good quickness and tremendous bend. He spent a lot of time on the outside in college, but his skills translate perfectly to 3T. Leal has the agility and burst to slip through interior gaps. However, he doesn’t win exclusively with athleticism. Leal has a diverse rush plan. He wins frequently with an arm over, as well as a swim move, among others. These abilities translate over to the run game, where he is able to get off the block and wrap up the ball carrier. His length helps him finish off these plays. Leal’s consistent usage on the edge speaks to his athleticism relative to interior linemen. He is very athletic for an inside rusher. His frame has room to fill out, and getting stronger can further elevate his game. Ceiling is sky high.

Weaknesses

While the usage on the edge is nice to see, as it showed his versatility, it also was a disservice to Leal’s development. His best fit is on the inside, and he didn’t get as much experience there as he could have. Further, his frame is too lean as a result of his positioning. At his current weight, interior offensive linemen will be able to stifle any kind of power move. He will need to get stronger and bulk up. 

Summary

Leal has tremendous upside as an interior rusher that was used out of position on the edge in college. He has tremendous athleticism and a wide variety of rush moves that will help him get into the backfield. Leal will certainly need to get stronger to handle the tough battle in the middle. But the ceiling is high, and he should, at the very least, be able to play a rotational role in year one, with potential to start either later in the year or in year 2.

Grade: 88.4Round Grade: 1st

3

Jordan Davis (Georgia) 6’6″, 341 lbs

Strengths

Davis is an old school NT. Big, beefy interior lineman who is outstanding at neutralising inside rushing attacks. He possesses great strength and is a handful to block one on one. Davis will often require double teams, which opens things up for the rest of the front seven. He packs a powerful punch and has strong hands. Davis does well to fall off blocks and bring down the ball carrier as he is entering his vicinity. His strength is good enough to push the pocket and make the QB reset his feet on passing plays. He is able to buy some time for the other rushers. 

Weaknesses

As is usually the case with NT’s, Davis isn’t the most mobile person you’ll see. He is someone who lives constantly in the trenches, and won’t usually be able to successfully venture outside when runs head toward the sideline. Pad level can end up quite high, which hurts his ability to create some push. Beyond just pushing the pocket, Davis won’t give you a ton as a pass rusher. He lacks the agility to quickly penetrate gaps, and the speed to get home if he does manage to get through.

Summary

Davis was a NT in college and he will maintain this role in the NFL. It is a role that is often underappreciated, but very important. Davis has the talent to come in and immediately improve a team’s ability to defend against the run. His strength, size, and power require extra attention. He eats up blocks and opens things up for the rest. Davis lacks ideal athleticism and won’t offer much as a pass rusher, which is standard for NT’s. Although maybe adding some rush moves could help improve this area a bit. The lack of positional value in the eyes of front offices may drop him, but I still see him going in the 1st. 

Grade: 85.1Round Grade: 1st

4

Phidarian Mathis (Alabama) 6’4″, 310 lbs

Strengths

Mathis is a solid all around interior lineman who is capable of both rushing the passer and stopping the run. His technique is nicely developed, and he has some rush moves in his tool box. His go to seems to be the swim move, which was effective. Mathis has underrated burst and straight line speed. He is able to get into the backfield and go after the QB. At the same time, he has the frame to eat up blocks and make plays in the run game. The hand technique also elevates his game when stopping the run. 

Weaknesses

Mathis is more of a linear athlete. He has the speed to get into the backfield when something opens up, but he lacks the agility to consistently finish the play off as the QB attempts to get away. Would-be sacks often turn into pressures. His frame is well built, but I was disappointed with the inconsistency of his ability to win with strength. He did at times, but at others, was moved off his spot. This, in particular, happened multiple times when the play was a run, and it opened up a lane for the RB. 

Summary

Mathis is well developed from a technique standpoint. While his lack of agility may limit his number of sacks, I still like his ability to create pressure and hurry the QB. He is well built and shows flashes of winning with power. However, the times his opponent was able to move him off his spot left a bad taste. If he can add a bit more strength, it could go a long way to rounding out his game a bit more. Upside isn’t sky high, per se, but it is high enough for him to be a good starter if he can put it all together.

Grade: 83.6Round Grade: 2nd

5

Perrion Winfrey (Oklahoma) 6’4″, 290 lbs

Strengths

Winfrey is a solid interior player with enough traits to develop into a starter. While his frame is lean, he shows power quite often. His punch especially can be quite punishing and knock his opponent back. Burst and speed are good. His get off is good and he has the burst to get into gaps as they open up. Winfrey shows flashes to good technique and some rush moves. They are good indicators of another level that he is capable of reaching. He had a knack for getting into the backfield on run plays, racking up his fair share of tackles for a loss.

Weaknesses

Winfrey, at this point, looks like a solid, but unspectacular prospect. While his speed and burst are good, he looks stiff when turning the corner, and it slows him down at the crucial point in the play when he is looking to sack the QB. Winfrey has a lean frame. It didn’t hurt him in college, but stronger players in the NFL may give him a tougher time. Rush moves came in flashes, and they were good, but he needs to use them more consistently.

Summary

Winfrey had a nice college career, showing ability against the run and pass. I think he has a pretty high floor, but his ceiling may be a bit cloudier. Athleticism is good in terms of burst and speed, but not lateral agility, and it hinders him as he tries to finish plays off. In the NFL, if he can increase the usage of his pass rush moves, and maintain his ability to win with power, he should be at least a solid starter, if not, better. 

Grade: 83.3Round Grade: 2nd

6

Travis Jones (Connecticut) 6’4″, 325 lbs

Strengths

Jones has good length, in addition to a well built frame to handle the battles in the middle of the trenches. Strength is good. Jones eats up blocks and can shove away his opponent and make a play on the ball carrier. He played mainly as a NT, but I see a bit more agility than what is standard for the position. He might offer a bit more versatility at the next level. As a pass rusher, Jones does well to push the pocket and is sometimes able to make it through into the backfield.

Weaknesses

Good run defender, and shows flashes as a pass rusher, but his game is still raw at this time. Jones lacks any kind of pass rush plan, relying on his physical traits. His rush could be a lot more effective with hand moves and counters mixed in. Athleticism is about average. It doesn’t really stand out, and he likely won’t be a super dynamic player. Field vision can be hit or miss. 

Summary

Jones has the potential to be a good player in this league. He has the strength and frame to make it as a NT. He does well to get off of blocks well, and he is a sure tackler. That said, I think a more diverse rush plan could add some versatility to his game, and allow him to line up in different spots. Athleticism is about average, so he may not have the highest ceiling, but he has enough traits to develop into a plus starter.

Grade: 83.2Round Grade: 2nd

7

Eyioma Uwazurike (Iowa State) 6’5″, 316 lbs

Strengths

Uwazurike has good trait-based upside. Athleticism is pretty solid, and he shows good bend and speed to make his way into the backfield. His strength is also solid, and he has flashed the ability to win with power. Uwazurike has a high motor and is constantly moving, looking to create disruption. He has a long reach that will set him up for successful rush moves, and allow him to reel in tackles.

Weaknesses

Uwazurike is largely a developmental prospect at this point. Many of his wins were strictly because of his physical traits. Either strength or speed/bend. He showed some flashes of rush moves, but I don’t see them often in my exposures. He’ll need to diversify his rush plan in the NFL. As well, he often gets his pad level up too high, which causes him to lose leverage.

Summary

Uwazurike has good strength and athleticism, which equals good upside. He showed these traits a good number of times, using each of them to get into the backfield. His length allows him to finish plays off once he is there. That said, his technique and pass rush plan need work, as he won’t be able to fully rely on traits in the NFL. He is said to have a good work ethic, and his motor on the field definitely reflects that. If he can put it all together, he does have starter potential.

Grade: 74.2Round Grade: 4th

8

Haskell Garrett (Ohio State) 6’2″, 300 lbs

Strengths

Garrett is a very savvy player who has a wide variety of pass rush moves in the toolbox. His swim move is effective on a consistent basis. As well, he has shown the ability to swipe at the hands of his opponent and then shove him out of the way. His quickness is an underrated aspect of his game. He combines that with his high motor to work his way into the backfield, slipping through open gaps. Against the run, Garrett has shown to be a good tackler. He wraps up and makes sure to follow through each tackle. No shortcuts are taken.

Weaknesses

Garrett is lacking in the strength department. There are a number of reps where he is moved off his spot too easily in one on one situations. Needless to say, taking on double teams isn’t really his thing either. While his quickness is good,I wouldn’t say he has top end speed to help him in his pursuit. As well, limited length can limit his ability to get off blocks, and increases the risk of missed tackles.

Summary

Garrett is very polished, showing good footwork and a wide variety of pass rush moves. Quickness is solid and he has a good motor that will help him in both phases. As he makes his transition, he will need to add a good amount of strength. Otherwise, stronger interior linemen will be able to wipe him out of plays on a consistent basis. If he can add strength and power to his game, Garrett should be an effective rotational lineman, or perhaps better.

Grade: 72.7Round Grade: 4th

9

Matthew Butler (Tennessee) 6’4″, 297 lbs

Strengths

Butler is a good athlete. He saw some time both on the outside and inside, showing the ability to win with good bend. His feet are quick and he has some twitchiness to him. He can move laterally across the line of scrimmage in his pursuit of the QB. This movement ability helps him against the run, as well. Butler’s feet don’t stop moving, making it tough as his opponents try to sustain blocks. He has a high motor and, even if he doesn’t get through right away, can make QB’s pay for holding the ball too long.

Weaknesses

Butler is a good athlete. He saw some time both on the outside and inside, showing the ability to win with good bend. His feet are quick and he has some twitchiness to him. He can move laterally across the line of scrimmage in his pursuit of the QB. This movement ability helps him against the run, as well. Butler’s feet don’t stop moving, making it tough as his opponents try to sustain blocks. He has a high motor and, even if he doesn’t get through right away, can make QB’s pay for holding the ball too long.

Summary

Strength is lacking. His opponents were able to anchor against him, and he wasn’t able to do much of anything against double teams. Strength will need to be added. In run defence, Butler can get washed out of the play too early. The odd time you would see an arm over or a push/pull move, but he didn’t take them out of the toolbox very often. His rush plan was plain, making it easier for his opponents. 

Grade: 68.7Round Grade: 5th

10

Neil Farrell (LSU) 6’4″, 330 lbs

Strengths

Farrell is a big, heavy NT with good run stopping abilities, and a bit more juice as a pass rusher than you sometimes see from a NT. His pure strength is good, and he effectively uses power to make his way into the backfield. He is savvy when getting off blocks. Farrell does well to do so at the last second and fall on the RB or close up the gap just as he attempts to get through. He has decent hand technique, and a few moves that allow him to win a little bit as a pass rusher. It is certainly not his bread and butter, but it is good to have at least some ability in this area. 

Weaknesses

Farrell isn’t the best athlete you’ll see. He has a decent get off, but his attack can look lethargic at times, and even a bit nonchalant. The hand technique helps him win at times when his initial bullrush is neutralised, but he needs to use his moves more often. Farrell doesn’t have the longest arms, which limits his tackle radius and ability to disengage from blocks. For someone who is primarily a run defender, this isn’t great.

Summary

Farrell will be a NT at the next level. He’ll be a rotational piece early, but could potentially start down the line. His strength and power make him well suited for this role. Additionally, his solid hand technique gives him a bit of pass rush ability. Lack of athleticism and length will drop him. He projects as a solid, but unspectacular player at the next level.

Grade: 66.6Round Grade: 5th

11

Thomas Booker (Stanford) 6’3″, 301 lbs

Strengths

Booker split time between the edge and interior in college. However, he doesn’t have the size to remain outside, meaning he will play DT in the NFL. He was athletic enough for the edge, meaning he has plus athleticism for the interior. Booker is quick to hit gaps, and has good lateral agility to adjust his body to make tackles. He does well to fall off blocks and make tackles. His athleticism gives him upside as a pass rusher if he can develop further.

Weaknesses

Booker was a tweener in college, but will have to add bulk to his frame if he is going to commit to DT. On a lot of his inside reps, he was manhandled by stronger guards, and paved out of the way on running plays. At this point, there aren’t many rush moves in the toolbox. He’ll need to develop his hand technique in order to win on a more consistent basis. 

Summary

Booker has some upside thanks to his good athleticism for an interior defender. That said, his lack of production will drop him. As well, he will need to get stronger and add bulk to his frame to better handle life in the trenches. Hand technique will also need to be developed, and more rush moves will need to be added to his game.

Grade: 63.7Round Grade: 6th

12

Jayden Peevy (Texas A&M) 6’5″, 308 lbs

Strengths

Peevy has some solid traits that are worth developing. Great length and good size to eat up blocks and come up with some nice stuffs in run defence. Length helps in disengaging from his opponent and he is able to fall off the block to make a tackle. He has a high motor and his constant pursuit, at worst, creates confusion in the pocket for the offence. You see some flashes as a pass rusher, and there were a few glimpses of some nicely timed get-offs that resulted in pressure. Peevy has the strength to push the pocket.

Weaknesses

Still underdeveloped and I would like to see the flashes turn into consistency. Peevy needs to make a point of using his hand moves more regularly. Oftentimes, I thought he looked sluggish in his pursuit of the QB. Perhaps dropping a bit of weight to add some speed and quickness would benefit his game.

Summary

Peevy has good strength and good length, which are both traits that you can work with. He looked sluggish on tape, but I don’t want to go as far as to say he’s not a good athlete. I think he can adjust his frame a little bit to maybe add some extra quickness. He has shown some nice flashes in both phases, but will need to turn them into consistency. Peevy is a developmental prospect, but has upside that is worth chasing.

Grade: 63.3Round Grade: 6th

13

Otito Ogbonnia (UCLA) 6’3″, 324 lbs

Strengths

Ogbonnia has a well built frame and good length. Strength is good and he shows flashes against the run. He is able to push his opponent forward, and his length helps him disengage from the block when it comes time to bring down the ball carrier. His strength allows him to push the pocket as a pass rusher, and there may be potential for him to expand on that.

Weaknesses

Ogbonnia is pretty one dimensional at this point. He lacks the athleticism and lateral agility to make a consistent impact as a pass rusher. While he has the strength to bull rush, he lacks the rush moves to counter when his initial rush is stifled. His burst is average, and there are some plays where he is slow off the ball. 

Summary

Ogbonnia may be limited to a NT role in the NFL, unless he can improve his pass rush. Athleticism isn’t great, and he lacks the lateral agility to make a big impact. Strength and length are both tools to work with, and have allowed him to have some success as a run defender. He will likely be a run defender in the NFL, and his ability to push the pocket as a pass rusher could add to his value as a rotational piece.

Grade: 59.8Round Grade: 7th

14

John Ridgeway (Arkansas) 6’5″, 321 lbs

Strengths

Ridgeway is a big NT prospect. He is a space eater in the middle. Ridgeways has a high motor and keeps moving through the snap. He is constantly trying to just plough right through, and is someone who can wear down opponents, who have to work hard to neutralise his power. Strength is the name of his game. As a pass rusher, he shows glimpses of nice bullrushes. He pays at a good pad level and can use leverage to his advantage. RIdgeway has a strong punch and can knock his opponent off balance. His long frame is an asset, as he can disengage from blocks and fall onto the ball carrier.

Weaknesses

Ridgeway is a one dimensional NT, whose role is very unlikely to be expanded in the NFL. At this point, power is his one and only move, and stronger interior linemen shouldn’t have a problem handling him when they can match his strength. In my exposures, I didn’t see any kind of pass rush or hand moves, making his attack predictable. Ridgeway isn’t a great athlete. He’s a big, linear mover. Not much quickness and not much explosion.

Summary

Ridgeway is a developmental NT at the next level. Lack of athleticism will be a turn off, but his size and strength are traits to work with. He will need to add some hand moves in order to diversify his attack. Ultimately, his ceiling is that of a rotational player, but he will need to work to make a roster out of camp.

Grade: 55.1Round Grade: 7th

Full DT Rankings:

  1. Devonte Wyatt (88.6, Rd 1)
  2. DeMarvin Leal (88.4, Rd 1)
  3. Jordan Davis (85.1, Rd 1)
  4. Phidarian Mathis (83.6, Rd 2)
  5. Perrion Winfrey (83.3, Rd 2)
  6. Travis Jones (83.2, Rd 2)
  7. Eyioma Uwazurike (74.2, Rd 4)
  8. Haskell Garrett (72.7, Rd 4)
  9. Matthew Butler (68.7, Rd 5)
  10. Neil Farrell (66.6, Rd 5)
  11. Thomas Booker (63.7, Rd 6)
  12. Jayden Peevy (63.3, Rd 6)
  13. Otito Ogbonnia (59.8, Rd 7)
  14. John Ridgeway (55.1, Rd 7)

Noteables Not Graded:

  • Kalia Davis
  • DJ Davidson
  • Noah Elliss